<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 117 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419079</link>
    <description>Acknowledgment of liability in balance sheets and later communications can extend limitation where the debt remains admitted and crystallised, and a DRT order may provide a fresh cause of action. On that basis, the section 7 application was treated as within limitation because the &quot;without prejudice&quot; letters still reflected acknowledgment of quantified dues. A valid assignee of a financial debt also qualifies as a financial creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and may maintain a section 7 application after stepping into the original lender&#039;s shoes. The admission order was therefore left undisturbed, and objections on limitation and maintainability failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 06:49:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671767" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 117 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419079</link>
      <description>Acknowledgment of liability in balance sheets and later communications can extend limitation where the debt remains admitted and crystallised, and a DRT order may provide a fresh cause of action. On that basis, the section 7 application was treated as within limitation because the &quot;without prejudice&quot; letters still reflected acknowledgment of quantified dues. A valid assignee of a financial debt also qualifies as a financial creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code and may maintain a section 7 application after stepping into the original lender&#039;s shoes. The admission order was therefore left undisturbed, and objections on limitation and maintainability failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419079</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>