<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 110 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419072</link>
    <description>The SC dismissed the SLP due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to deposit the amount under the Scheme within the 30-day limit. The HC&#039;s refusal to grant an extension was upheld, emphasizing adherence to Scheme terms for benefit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2022 13:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671760" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 110 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419072</link>
      <description>The SC dismissed the SLP due to the petitioner&#039;s failure to deposit the amount under the Scheme within the 30-day limit. The HC&#039;s refusal to grant an extension was upheld, emphasizing adherence to Scheme terms for benefit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419072</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>