https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419069 The Tribunal decided to condone the delay in filing the appeal, attributed to the misplacement of the order copy and difficulties in obtaining it, imposing a cost of Rs. 1,00,000 to be paid to the PM CARE Fund. It determined that the impugned order was effectively served by affixing it on the notice board, as per statutory provisions. Despite acknowledging the lack of justification for the significant delay in filing the appeal, the Tribunal allowed the appeal to proceed upon payment of the imposed cost, emphasizing compliance with procedural requirements and the impact of delays in legal proceedings. en-us Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Mar 2022 06:48:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419069 The Tribunal decided to condone the delay in filing the appeal, attributed to the misplacement of the order copy and difficulties in obtaining it, imposing a cost of Rs. 1,00,000 to be paid to the PM CARE Fund. It determined that the impugned order was effectively served by affixing it on the notice board, as per statutory provisions. Despite acknowledging the lack of justification for the significant delay in filing the appeal, the Tribunal allowed the appeal to proceed upon payment of the imposed cost, emphasizing compliance with procedural requirements and the impact of delays in legal proceedings. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419069