<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1785 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300895</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions under Sections 69A and 69C of the Income-tax Act, based on lack of evidence and unreliable statements. The Tribunal also rejected Revenue&#039;s claims of Rule 46A violations and inadmissibility of appeals against protective assessments. The issue of payment through a debit card was remitted to the AO for further investigation, while cross objections by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 06:47:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1785 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300895</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete additions under Sections 69A and 69C of the Income-tax Act, based on lack of evidence and unreliable statements. The Tribunal also rejected Revenue&#039;s claims of Rule 46A violations and inadmissibility of appeals against protective assessments. The issue of payment through a debit card was remitted to the AO for further investigation, while cross objections by the assessee were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>