<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (2) TMI 1620 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300900</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and accepted the assessee&#039;s petition under Rule 27 of ITAT Rules. It directed the Assessing Officer to adjust the refund first towards interest under Section 244A, followed by any remaining amount towards the tax due, aligning with section 140A of the Act. This decision clarified the proper adjustment of refunds against interest and tax due, ensuring compliance with the Income Tax Act and a fair process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 06:47:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671737" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (2) TMI 1620 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300900</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and accepted the assessee&#039;s petition under Rule 27 of ITAT Rules. It directed the Assessing Officer to adjust the refund first towards interest under Section 244A, followed by any remaining amount towards the tax due, aligning with section 140A of the Act. This decision clarified the proper adjustment of refunds against interest and tax due, ensuring compliance with the Income Tax Act and a fair process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>