https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419054 HC declined to entertain the writ application challenging a State Tax Officer's order in Form GST MOV-11, noting that statutory remedy was available through appeal under Section 107 of GST Act. The Court granted liberty to file an appeal and advised on provisional release of goods (Arecanut) under Section 67, considering their perishable nature. The petitioner committed to file an appeal within eight days along with an application for provisional release. The Court directed the appellate authority to decide on provisional release within one week of application filing. en-us Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 10:20:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419054 HC declined to entertain the writ application challenging a State Tax Officer's order in Form GST MOV-11, noting that statutory remedy was available through appeal under Section 107 of GST Act. The Court granted liberty to file an appeal and advised on provisional release of goods (Arecanut) under Section 67, considering their perishable nature. The petitioner committed to file an appeal within eight days along with an application for provisional release. The Court directed the appellate authority to decide on provisional release within one week of application filing. Case-Laws GST Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419054