<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 87 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419049</link>
    <description>The HC addressed parallel enquiries by DGGI units in Siliguri and Kolkata regarding search and seizure operations. The court held that while writ petitions against summons are not maintainable, the centralized DGGI (East) Kolkata unit, having jurisdiction over entire Eastern India, should conduct the investigation to avoid inconsistency. All files from Siliguri unit were ordered transferred to Kolkata unit. The court quashed summons issued to a doctor who provided medical certificate for adjournment, ruling authorities were unjustified in summoning the medical professional who acted within statutory duties. The writ appeals were partly allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 87 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419049</link>
      <description>The HC addressed parallel enquiries by DGGI units in Siliguri and Kolkata regarding search and seizure operations. The court held that while writ petitions against summons are not maintainable, the centralized DGGI (East) Kolkata unit, having jurisdiction over entire Eastern India, should conduct the investigation to avoid inconsistency. All files from Siliguri unit were ordered transferred to Kolkata unit. The court quashed summons issued to a doctor who provided medical certificate for adjournment, ruling authorities were unjustified in summoning the medical professional who acted within statutory duties. The writ appeals were partly allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>