<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 78 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419040</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act as the Assessing Officer failed to specify the grounds for the penalty in the notice, following the decision of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court. The appeal of the assessee was allowed due to the procedural irregularity, leading to the conclusion that the penalty was not justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 08:35:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671687" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 78 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419040</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act as the Assessing Officer failed to specify the grounds for the penalty in the notice, following the decision of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court. The appeal of the assessee was allowed due to the procedural irregularity, leading to the conclusion that the penalty was not justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>