<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (4) TMI 29 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28170</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision to include unpaid Central sales tax amounts in the firms&#039; income for assessment, dismissing the writ petitions challenging the notices issued by the Income Tax Officer. The court found that the ITO&#039;s actions were not illegal or beyond jurisdiction based on prevailing legal interpretations, emphasizing that the nature of the receipt determines its tax treatment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:53:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (4) TMI 29 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28170</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision to include unpaid Central sales tax amounts in the firms&#039; income for assessment, dismissing the writ petitions challenging the notices issued by the Income Tax Officer. The court found that the ITO&#039;s actions were not illegal or beyond jurisdiction based on prevailing legal interpretations, emphasizing that the nature of the receipt determines its tax treatment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>