<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 59 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419021</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, a custom house agent, in an appeal against the rejection of his renewal application by the Commissioner of Customs. The court found that the refusal to renew the license based solely on one isolated irregularity, for which a penalty and suspension had already been imposed, was unjustified. Emphasizing that non-renewal would permanently hinder the appellant&#039;s business, the court set aside the decision, stating that the isolated incident was insufficient grounds for denial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Apr 2022 11:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671664" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 59 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419021</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the appellant, a custom house agent, in an appeal against the rejection of his renewal application by the Commissioner of Customs. The court found that the refusal to renew the license based solely on one isolated irregularity, for which a penalty and suspension had already been imposed, was unjustified. Emphasizing that non-renewal would permanently hinder the appellant&#039;s business, the court set aside the decision, stating that the isolated incident was insufficient grounds for denial.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>