<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 52 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419014</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of service tax on renting of immovable property but set aside penalties, as the appellant had paid the tax before the show cause notice (SCN). The demand of service tax on business support services was dismissed as no joint venture was found, and penalties were annulled. The appeal was allowed, and penalties on both issues were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 08:34:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 52 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419014</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand of service tax on renting of immovable property but set aside penalties, as the appellant had paid the tax before the show cause notice (SCN). The demand of service tax on business support services was dismissed as no joint venture was found, and penalties were annulled. The appeal was allowed, and penalties on both issues were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419014</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>