https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419006 The HC dismissed a challenge to a search and seizure operation and subsequent summons. The petitioner claimed a payment was forcibly made during the search and had filed a retraction. While the court declined to interfere with the ongoing investigation, it directed authorities to consider the petitioner's representation within three weeks, providing an opportunity for hearing. The court clarified that the alleged forcible payment issue would be determined by the final investigation outcome, and the investigation could proceed unhindered. en-us Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 02 Apr 2025 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419006 The HC dismissed a challenge to a search and seizure operation and subsequent summons. The petitioner claimed a payment was forcibly made during the search and had filed a retraction. While the court declined to interfere with the ongoing investigation, it directed authorities to consider the petitioner's representation within three weeks, providing an opportunity for hearing. The court clarified that the alleged forcible payment issue would be determined by the final investigation outcome, and the investigation could proceed unhindered. Case-Laws GST Wed, 19 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419006