<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (4) TMI 575 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300868</link>
    <description>Construing the notification by its language, the SC found no basis to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Applying ordinary judicial review principles, it held that the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion was consistent with the notification as framed and that no further error or reasoning was shown to justify intervention. The civil appeal was dismissed, leaving the Tribunal&#039;s decision undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2022 14:53:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (4) TMI 575 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300868</link>
      <description>Construing the notification by its language, the SC found no basis to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s decision. Applying ordinary judicial review principles, it held that the Tribunal&#039;s conclusion was consistent with the notification as framed and that no further error or reasoning was shown to justify intervention. The civil appeal was dismissed, leaving the Tribunal&#039;s decision undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300868</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>