<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (12) TMI 6 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28163</link>
    <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that there was insufficient evidence to prove the assessees had suppressed stocks or concealed income. Penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act were cancelled due to lack of proof of concealment. The court awarded costs of Rs. 500 to the assessees.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:35:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67161" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (12) TMI 6 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28163</link>
      <description>The High Court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision that there was insufficient evidence to prove the assessees had suppressed stocks or concealed income. Penalties under section 271(1)(c) of the I.T. Act were cancelled due to lack of proof of concealment. The court awarded costs of Rs. 500 to the assessees.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>