<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 41 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419003</link>
    <description>In pre-emptive purchase proceedings under Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, the affected parties must receive a fair, adequate and effective opportunity to meet the proposed action, including disclosure of the material relied upon. A hearing fixed at the end of the limitation period without supplying valuation and sale-instance documents fails natural justice. Valuation must also rest on relevant considerations: a subsisting tenancy, the property&#039;s housing-society structure, mortgage and pending disputes, and comparable tenanted properties where appropriate. The authority cannot disregard these factors or question the legality of the underlying transaction. On the stated reasoning, the purchase order and valuation findings were unsustainable, and relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2022 15:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671586" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 41 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419003</link>
      <description>In pre-emptive purchase proceedings under Chapter XX-C of the Income-tax Act, the affected parties must receive a fair, adequate and effective opportunity to meet the proposed action, including disclosure of the material relied upon. A hearing fixed at the end of the limitation period without supplying valuation and sale-instance documents fails natural justice. Valuation must also rest on relevant considerations: a subsisting tenancy, the property&#039;s housing-society structure, mortgage and pending disputes, and comparable tenanted properties where appropriate. The authority cannot disregard these factors or question the legality of the underlying transaction. On the stated reasoning, the purchase order and valuation findings were unsustainable, and relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>