<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 38 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419000</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the treatment of compensation received for vacating tenancy as capital gains. The Court found no grounds to interfere, affirming that the consideration for surrendering tenancy rights should be assessed as capital gains. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the substantial question of law was answered against the revenue, leading to the closure of the related stay application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2022 08:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671583" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 38 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419000</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, dismissing the revenue&#039;s appeal regarding the treatment of compensation received for vacating tenancy as capital gains. The Court found no grounds to interfere, affirming that the consideration for surrendering tenancy rights should be assessed as capital gains. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, and the substantial question of law was answered against the revenue, leading to the closure of the related stay application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=419000</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>