<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (3) TMI 31 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418993</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee&#039;s Cross Objection was also dismissed. The judgment emphasized that the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) apply only to registered and beneficial shareholders, and business transactions cannot be categorized as loans to attract deemed dividend provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2022 08:19:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671576" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (3) TMI 31 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418993</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition under Section 2(22)(e) of the Income Tax Act. The assessee&#039;s Cross Objection was also dismissed. The judgment emphasized that the provisions of Section 2(22)(e) apply only to registered and beneficial shareholders, and business transactions cannot be categorized as loans to attract deemed dividend provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418993</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>