<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (10) TMI 1497 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300854</link>
    <description>A pre-CIRP sale of an industrial unit on an &quot;as is where is&quot; and &quot;as is what is&quot; basis, with the bidder expressly notified of outstanding employee, labour, provident fund, income-tax and other dues, shifts those liabilities to the purchaser rather than leaving them with the corporate debtor. The tribunal treated the disclosed liabilities as part of the purchase burden and held that the corporate debtor could not later be fastened with Unit-1&#039;s dues after the sale. The only exception noted was any EPF amount already deducted and still retained by the corporate debtor, which had to be remitted to the appropriate authority.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 20:23:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671524" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (10) TMI 1497 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300854</link>
      <description>A pre-CIRP sale of an industrial unit on an &quot;as is where is&quot; and &quot;as is what is&quot; basis, with the bidder expressly notified of outstanding employee, labour, provident fund, income-tax and other dues, shifts those liabilities to the purchaser rather than leaving them with the corporate debtor. The tribunal treated the disclosed liabilities as part of the purchase burden and held that the corporate debtor could not later be fastened with Unit-1&#039;s dues after the sale. The only exception noted was any EPF amount already deducted and still retained by the corporate debtor, which had to be remitted to the appropriate authority.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>