<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1825 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300847</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s treatment of profit from the sale of land as business income, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments against reassessment validity and other grounds. The decision was based on the nature of the transaction and steps taken for land development, following legal precedents and factual considerations. Despite the appellant&#039;s contentions, the order was deemed valid, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 12:43:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671499" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1825 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300847</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s treatment of profit from the sale of land as business income, rejecting the appellant&#039;s arguments against reassessment validity and other grounds. The decision was based on the nature of the transaction and steps taken for land development, following legal precedents and factual considerations. Despite the appellant&#039;s contentions, the order was deemed valid, and the appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300847</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>