<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1206 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418955</link>
    <description>Employees&#039; contribution to provident fund remains deductible where it is deposited before the due date for filing the return of income, even if payment was made after the due date prescribed under the provident fund law. Applying a beneficial construction of the relevant provisions and its earlier view on similar facts, the ITAT Visakhapatnam held that the disallowance under the Income-tax Act could not survive and the addition was rightly deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:34:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671481" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1206 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418955</link>
      <description>Employees&#039; contribution to provident fund remains deductible where it is deposited before the due date for filing the return of income, even if payment was made after the due date prescribed under the provident fund law. Applying a beneficial construction of the relevant provisions and its earlier view on similar facts, the ITAT Visakhapatnam held that the disallowance under the Income-tax Act could not survive and the addition was rightly deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>