<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1196 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418945</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the assessee for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 were dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders, which allowed 70% of the agricultural income as net income and disallowed 30% as expenses. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions reasonable, confirming the additions made by the AO and partly sustained by the CIT(A).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:33:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1196 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418945</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the assessee for AY 2014-15 and AY 2015-16 were dismissed. The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s orders, which allowed 70% of the agricultural income as net income and disallowed 30% as expenses. The Tribunal found the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions reasonable, confirming the additions made by the AO and partly sustained by the CIT(A).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>