<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (3) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28148</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the remuneration and commission received by the assessee as managing director were assessable in the hands of the Hindu undivided family (HUF). The Court emphasized the connection between the investment of joint family funds and the income received, following established legal principles. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the remuneration and commission were to be considered as HUF income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:00:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67146" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (3) TMI 5 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28148</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the remuneration and commission received by the assessee as managing director were assessable in the hands of the Hindu undivided family (HUF). The Court emphasized the connection between the investment of joint family funds and the income received, following established legal principles. The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the remuneration and commission were to be considered as HUF income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>