<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418933</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to disallow interest expenditure of Rs. 70,00,371 related to Project &#039;B,&#039; classifying it as capital expenditure to be capitalized in the Work in Progress. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the disallowance and emphasizing the significance of the accounting method in determining the allowability of interest expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:32:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1184 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418933</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the CIT(A) to disallow interest expenditure of Rs. 70,00,371 related to Project &#039;B,&#039; classifying it as capital expenditure to be capitalized in the Work in Progress. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the disallowance and emphasizing the significance of the accounting method in determining the allowability of interest expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>