<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1178 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418927</link>
    <description>Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 empowers the Tribunal to entertain rectification of the register of members where shares are entered without sufficient cause or where an entry is omitted or delayed, and to make consequential corrections to company records. On the facts stated, the appellant had sought cancellation of excess shares and the first respondent had given no objection, so the requirement to first approach the Registrar of Companies was erroneous. The Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction to consider rectification and cancellation of the excess shares was therefore available, and the dismissal of the company petition was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2022 08:32:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671446" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1178 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418927</link>
      <description>Section 59 of the Companies Act, 2013 empowers the Tribunal to entertain rectification of the register of members where shares are entered without sufficient cause or where an entry is omitted or delayed, and to make consequential corrections to company records. On the facts stated, the appellant had sought cancellation of excess shares and the first respondent had given no objection, so the requirement to first approach the Registrar of Companies was erroneous. The Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction to consider rectification and cancellation of the excess shares was therefore available, and the dismissal of the company petition was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418927</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>