<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1633 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300835</link>
    <description>Criminal prosecution may be quashed where the charge-sheet does not disclose the essential ingredients of the alleged offences and the materials fail to connect the accused with manipulation of locker records, conspiracy, impersonation, forgery, or falsification of accounts. On the recorded facts, the bank officer had received and acted on the application for deletion and addition of names, while the petitioner was not shown to be the public servant or bank officer whose conduct would attract the charged offences. The continuation of proceedings was also treated as abusive because the petitioner had already been exonerated on merits in connected adjudicatory proceedings on the same facts, and the criminal proceedings and charge-sheet were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2022 20:35:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1633 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300835</link>
      <description>Criminal prosecution may be quashed where the charge-sheet does not disclose the essential ingredients of the alleged offences and the materials fail to connect the accused with manipulation of locker records, conspiracy, impersonation, forgery, or falsification of accounts. On the recorded facts, the bank officer had received and acted on the application for deletion and addition of names, while the petitioner was not shown to be the public servant or bank officer whose conduct would attract the charged offences. The continuation of proceedings was also treated as abusive because the petitioner had already been exonerated on merits in connected adjudicatory proceedings on the same facts, and the criminal proceedings and charge-sheet were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300835</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>