<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (9) TMI 1632 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300841</link>
    <description>The Legal Metrology Act, 2009, being a special law with an overriding clause, displaced prosecution under Chapter XIII of the IPC only for offences covering the same weight-and-measure violations, so charges under Sections 265 and 267 IPC were not maintainable. Offences of cheating, forgery, use of forged documents, common intention and conspiracy were distinct and not created by the special Act, so prosecution under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 and 120-B IPC remained maintainable. Directions issued under Section 482 CrPC controlling investigation, changing the investigating officer, involving the District Judge, and ordering ancillary administrative action were beyond judicial power and were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2022 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671400" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (9) TMI 1632 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300841</link>
      <description>The Legal Metrology Act, 2009, being a special law with an overriding clause, displaced prosecution under Chapter XIII of the IPC only for offences covering the same weight-and-measure violations, so charges under Sections 265 and 267 IPC were not maintainable. Offences of cheating, forgery, use of forged documents, common intention and conspiracy were distinct and not created by the special Act, so prosecution under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34 and 120-B IPC remained maintainable. Directions issued under Section 482 CrPC controlling investigation, changing the investigating officer, involving the District Judge, and ordering ancillary administrative action were beyond judicial power and were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>