<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (2) TMI 1300 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300817</link>
    <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding that the Scrap Road Mobile Crane did not meet the definition of a motor vehicle under the Motors Vehicle Act, 1988. As the crane was incapable of self-propulsion on roads and was only movable by towing, it was not subject to registration or taxation. The Court deemed the detention of the crane by respondent no. 3 as illegal and granted relief to the petitioner, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2022 10:46:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671385" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (2) TMI 1300 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300817</link>
      <description>The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, finding that the Scrap Road Mobile Crane did not meet the definition of a motor vehicle under the Motors Vehicle Act, 1988. As the crane was incapable of self-propulsion on roads and was only movable by towing, it was not subject to registration or taxation. The Court deemed the detention of the crane by respondent no. 3 as illegal and granted relief to the petitioner, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300817</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>