<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1492 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300816</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that cash payments made by the assessee to State Government Undertakings in legal tender were exempt under Rule 6DD(b) of the Income-Tax Rules, 1962. The disallowance under Section 40A(3) was vacated, amounting to Rs. 2,07,24,418/-. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the payments to State Government entities did not violate Section 40A(3) due to Rule 6DD(b)&#039;s applicability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 17:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1492 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300816</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, ruling that cash payments made by the assessee to State Government Undertakings in legal tender were exempt under Rule 6DD(b) of the Income-Tax Rules, 1962. The disallowance under Section 40A(3) was vacated, amounting to Rs. 2,07,24,418/-. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed as the payments to State Government entities did not violate Section 40A(3) due to Rule 6DD(b)&#039;s applicability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300816</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>