<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1160 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418909</link>
    <description>Refund claims under Section 54(1) of the CGST Act were examined against the limitation period in light of orders extending limitation during the Covid-19 pandemic. The issue was whether those extension orders affected the timeliness of the refund applications. Notice was issued and the matter was listed for further hearing, so no substantive determination on limitation was recorded in the supplied text.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 11:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1160 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418909</link>
      <description>Refund claims under Section 54(1) of the CGST Act were examined against the limitation period in light of orders extending limitation during the Covid-19 pandemic. The issue was whether those extension orders affected the timeliness of the refund applications. Notice was issued and the matter was listed for further hearing, so no substantive determination on limitation was recorded in the supplied text.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418909</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>