<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1136 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418885</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) adjustments for both Advertisement, Marketing, and Promotional (AMP) expenses and the import of finished goods (Pringles). The Tribunal emphasized the significance of following legal precedents and appropriate benchmarking methods in transfer pricing cases, ultimately concluding that no adjustment was necessary in either instance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2022 05:59:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1136 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418885</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the deletion of the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) adjustments for both Advertisement, Marketing, and Promotional (AMP) expenses and the import of finished goods (Pringles). The Tribunal emphasized the significance of following legal precedents and appropriate benchmarking methods in transfer pricing cases, ultimately concluding that no adjustment was necessary in either instance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>