<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1122 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418871</link>
    <description>The appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded. The demand for &#039;Works Contract&#039; prior to 01.07.2012 was set aside as it could not be sustained under &#039;Commercial or Industrial Construction Service&#039;. The demand for the period post-2012 and the sole labor contract for the period prior to 2012 were remanded to the Commissioner for reassessment. All penalties were set aside. The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to pass a reasoned order after verifying the appellant&#039;s records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2022 05:59:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1122 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418871</link>
      <description>The appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded. The demand for &#039;Works Contract&#039; prior to 01.07.2012 was set aside as it could not be sustained under &#039;Commercial or Industrial Construction Service&#039;. The demand for the period post-2012 and the sole labor contract for the period prior to 2012 were remanded to the Commissioner for reassessment. All penalties were set aside. The Tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to pass a reasoned order after verifying the appellant&#039;s records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418871</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>