https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418864 An administrative office order could not override a prior judicial determination declaring the respondent an absconder, and the Court treated the earlier proceedings under the Code of Criminal Procedure and repeated non-appearance as relevant. However, it declined to interfere with the impugned order at that stage, noting that setting it aside could delay the trial further. The respondent undertook to appear before the trial court and pay the outstanding costs, and the petition was disposed of on those conditions without substantive interference with the order under challenge. en-us Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 26 Feb 2022 05:58:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418864 An administrative office order could not override a prior judicial determination declaring the respondent an absconder, and the Court treated the earlier proceedings under the Code of Criminal Procedure and repeated non-appearance as relevant. However, it declined to interfere with the impugned order at that stage, noting that setting it aside could delay the trial further. The respondent undertook to appear before the trial court and pay the outstanding costs, and the petition was disposed of on those conditions without substantive interference with the order under challenge. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418864