<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (4) TMI 1296 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300811</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order for stay of tax demand under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2014-15. The court found no valid ground for interference, noting the 1st respondent&#039;s consideration of relevant facts and exercise of discretionary powers in granting conditional stay. The court directed the 2nd respondent to expedite the disposal of the pending appeal within four weeks to ensure a prompt resolution for the petitioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 19:10:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (4) TMI 1296 - TELANGANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300811</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging the order for stay of tax demand under the Income Tax Act for the assessment year 2014-15. The court found no valid ground for interference, noting the 1st respondent&#039;s consideration of relevant facts and exercise of discretionary powers in granting conditional stay. The court directed the 2nd respondent to expedite the disposal of the pending appeal within four weeks to ensure a prompt resolution for the petitioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300811</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>