https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300804 The SC held that the availability of a Letters Patent appeal is a relevant factor when special leave is sought under Article 136, but there is no inflexible rule requiring refusal or revocation merely because that remedy was not first pursued; the objection was therefore rejected. It further held that a second appellate decree must comply with Section 100 CPC and disclose proper judicial reasoning, and a judgment lacking reasons cannot be sustained as a valid adjudication. The High Court's decree was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh disposal in accordance with law, leaving the underlying merits open. en-us Fri, 06 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:46:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300804 The SC held that the availability of a Letters Patent appeal is a relevant factor when special leave is sought under Article 136, but there is no inflexible rule requiring refusal or revocation merely because that remedy was not first pursued; the objection was therefore rejected. It further held that a second appellate decree must comply with Section 100 CPC and disclose proper judicial reasoning, and a judgment lacking reasons cannot be sustained as a valid adjudication. The High Court's decree was set aside and the matter remitted for fresh disposal in accordance with law, leaving the underlying merits open. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 06 Mar 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300804