https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300803 The writ petitions challenged a telefax communication dated 04.05.2009, as it was not based on any BIFR order. After detailed arguments, both parties agreed to set aside the communication due to the absence of an order from the Bench. The communication was thus revoked, restoring the situation to that of 03.05.2009. The Court refrained from discussing the merits to prevent further confusion. Both parties agreed to disregard the communication without prejudicing their rights. They were granted the liberty to address their concerns before the appropriate forum, including the BIFR. The writ petitions were resolved, and the BIFR record was to be promptly returned. en-us Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:24:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300803 The writ petitions challenged a telefax communication dated 04.05.2009, as it was not based on any BIFR order. After detailed arguments, both parties agreed to set aside the communication due to the absence of an order from the Bench. The communication was thus revoked, restoring the situation to that of 03.05.2009. The Court refrained from discussing the merits to prevent further confusion. Both parties agreed to disregard the communication without prejudicing their rights. They were granted the liberty to address their concerns before the appropriate forum, including the BIFR. The writ petitions were resolved, and the BIFR record was to be promptly returned. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Apr 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300803