<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1240 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300801</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the Transfer Petition seeking to move proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act from Agra, Uttar Pradesh to Siliguri, West Bengal. The reasons provided by the petitioners, including the delivery challan specifying Siliguri jurisdiction, a prior criminal complaint, and the respondent&#039;s Head Office location, were deemed insufficient for transfer. The court emphasized that the jurisdictional issue should have been raised earlier and highlighted the relevance of the bank branch location in determining jurisdiction. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 14:27:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671282" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1240 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300801</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the Transfer Petition seeking to move proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act from Agra, Uttar Pradesh to Siliguri, West Bengal. The reasons provided by the petitioners, including the delivery challan specifying Siliguri jurisdiction, a prior criminal complaint, and the respondent&#039;s Head Office location, were deemed insufficient for transfer. The court emphasized that the jurisdictional issue should have been raised earlier and highlighted the relevance of the bank branch location in determining jurisdiction. Consequently, the petition was dismissed, and pending applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=300801</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>