https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418858 The HC addressed petitioners' complaints of harassment through 20 summonses issued between December 2020-February 2022 under GST Act without proper show cause notices. The court directed the Additional Director General of DGGI, Pune to personally investigate the matter and ordered respondents to establish norms regarding summons frequency and purpose. The constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of GST Act was challenged, prompting notices to the Attorney General and Advocate General. Respondents must provide 7 days' notice before taking any coercive recovery steps, during which petitioners may seek interim relief. en-us Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Apr 2025 11:10:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418858 The HC addressed petitioners' complaints of harassment through 20 summonses issued between December 2020-February 2022 under GST Act without proper show cause notices. The court directed the Additional Director General of DGGI, Pune to personally investigate the matter and ordered respondents to establish norms regarding summons frequency and purpose. The constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of GST Act was challenged, prompting notices to the Attorney General and Advocate General. Respondents must provide 7 days' notice before taking any coercive recovery steps, during which petitioners may seek interim relief. Case-Laws GST Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418858