<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1089 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418838</link>
    <description>The appeal regarding the addition due to undervaluation of closing stock was dismissed, while the appeal against the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was allowed, quashing the penalty order. The tribunal found that the penalty was not justified as it was a case of valuation difference rather than conscious concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:34:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671233" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1089 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418838</link>
      <description>The appeal regarding the addition due to undervaluation of closing stock was dismissed, while the appeal against the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income was allowed, quashing the penalty order. The tribunal found that the penalty was not justified as it was a case of valuation difference rather than conscious concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418838</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>