<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1085 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418834</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The assessee&#039;s appeal was withdrawn due to the resolution under the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) between India and the U.S.A. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was dismissed as the Tribunal found that the payments were reimbursements on a cost-to-cost basis without profit, not subject to TDS under section 194C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 17:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1085 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418834</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both the assessee&#039;s and the Revenue&#039;s appeals. The assessee&#039;s appeal was withdrawn due to the resolution under the Mutual Agreement Procedure (MAP) between India and the U.S.A. The Revenue&#039;s appeal challenging the deletion of disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) was dismissed as the Tribunal found that the payments were reimbursements on a cost-to-cost basis without profit, not subject to TDS under section 194C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418834</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>