https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418818 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving denial of CENVAT credit due to lack of Input Service Distributor (ISD) registration. The appellant, a manufacturing plant, successfully argued that the denial of credit solely for ISD registration issues was unjust, citing legal precedents and a circular. The Tribunal set aside the demand order, except for a specific amount not contested by the appellant. Additionally, the Tribunal overturned the demand of Central Excise duty for a specific period, disallowed input service credit, and penalty imposition, while also rejecting the Department's request to levy interest on the demanded duty amount. en-us Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:33:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418818 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving denial of CENVAT credit due to lack of Input Service Distributor (ISD) registration. The appellant, a manufacturing plant, successfully argued that the denial of credit solely for ISD registration issues was unjust, citing legal precedents and a circular. The Tribunal set aside the demand order, except for a specific amount not contested by the appellant. Additionally, the Tribunal overturned the demand of Central Excise duty for a specific period, disallowed input service credit, and penalty imposition, while also rejecting the Department's request to levy interest on the demanded duty amount. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 23 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418818