<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1064 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418813</link>
    <description>The court quashed the proceedings in E.O.C.C.Nos.582 &amp;amp; 583 of 2017 as there was no evidence of deliberate tax evasion by the petitioner, leading to the conclusion that continuing prosecution would constitute an abuse of the legal process. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the Criminal Original Petitions and closing the connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 18:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1064 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418813</link>
      <description>The court quashed the proceedings in E.O.C.C.Nos.582 &amp;amp; 583 of 2017 as there was no evidence of deliberate tax evasion by the petitioner, leading to the conclusion that continuing prosecution would constitute an abuse of the legal process. The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, allowing the Criminal Original Petitions and closing the connected Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418813</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>