<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1059 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418808</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12, vacating the additions made by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of direct evidence linking the assessee to the unexplained investments and the rebuttable nature of the presumption under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 11:28:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1059 - ITAT RAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418808</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for the assessment years 2010-11 and 2011-12, vacating the additions made by the AO. The Tribunal emphasized the lack of direct evidence linking the assessee to the unexplained investments and the rebuttable nature of the presumption under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418808</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>