<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 58 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28116</link>
    <description>Section 64(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applies to income arising to a minor child for inclusion in the income of an individual, not to income connected with a Hindu undivided family capacity. Where the assessee was a partner in a firm only as karta of an HUF and not in his personal capacity, the minor children&#039;s share income could not be clubbed with his individual income. The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:29:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67114" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 58 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28116</link>
      <description>Section 64(1)(ii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 applies to income arising to a minor child for inclusion in the income of an individual, not to income connected with a Hindu undivided family capacity. Where the assessee was a partner in a firm only as karta of an HUF and not in his personal capacity, the minor children&#039;s share income could not be clubbed with his individual income. The issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28116</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>