<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 56 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28114</link>
    <description>Compensation for coal mines could not be finally quantified until the statutory apportionment process under the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act, 1973 was completed by the Commissioner of Claims and the District Court. Because the assessee&#039;s terminal loss under section 32(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or taxable profit under section 41(2) depended on the final amount available after apportionment, the estimated figure accepted by the appellate authority was not conclusive. The Tribunal was therefore justified in leaving the income-tax issue open and remanding the matter to the Income-tax Officer after the District Court&#039;s award.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:20:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 56 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28114</link>
      <description>Compensation for coal mines could not be finally quantified until the statutory apportionment process under the Coal Mines Nationalisation Act, 1973 was completed by the Commissioner of Claims and the District Court. Because the assessee&#039;s terminal loss under section 32(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, or taxable profit under section 41(2) depended on the final amount available after apportionment, the estimated figure accepted by the appellate authority was not conclusive. The Tribunal was therefore justified in leaving the income-tax issue open and remanding the matter to the Income-tax Officer after the District Court&#039;s award.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28114</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>