<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1035 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418784</link>
    <description>Interim protection against coercive action was warranted on a constitutional challenge to the impugned notifications, as similar challenges had already received interim relief in other High Courts and the respondents did not dispute that position while seeking time to file a reply. The Court therefore granted protection from coercive steps in favour of the petitioner till the next date of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 07:13:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1035 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418784</link>
      <description>Interim protection against coercive action was warranted on a constitutional challenge to the impugned notifications, as similar challenges had already received interim relief in other High Courts and the respondents did not dispute that position while seeking time to file a reply. The Court therefore granted protection from coercive steps in favour of the petitioner till the next date of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>