<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1984 (3) TMI 55 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28112</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer additional legal questions for clarification regarding the obligations of the assessee under the Wealth-tax Act. The court emphasized the duty of the assessee to disclose accurate asset values, including estimated values, to comply with the law. Judges M. M. Punchhi and R. N. Mittal concurred on the importance of precise asset valuation and the legal obligations of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 11:12:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1984 (3) TMI 55 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28112</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the Tribunal to refer additional legal questions for clarification regarding the obligations of the assessee under the Wealth-tax Act. The court emphasized the duty of the assessee to disclose accurate asset values, including estimated values, to comply with the law. Judges M. M. Punchhi and R. N. Mittal concurred on the importance of precise asset valuation and the legal obligations of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 1984 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28112</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>