https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418769 The court dismissed the petitioners' arguments regarding the Fresh Start Scheme and the need for a prior hearing. It upheld the automatic nature of disqualification under Sections 164(2) and 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. However, it ruled in favor of the petitioners on the issue of Director Identification Number (DIN) deactivation, stating that such deactivation is not automatic and must be reconsidered, subject to compliance with filing requirements. The writ petition was allowed to this limited extent, with no order as to costs. en-us Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Feb 2022 23:19:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418769 The court dismissed the petitioners' arguments regarding the Fresh Start Scheme and the need for a prior hearing. It upheld the automatic nature of disqualification under Sections 164(2) and 167(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. However, it ruled in favor of the petitioners on the issue of Director Identification Number (DIN) deactivation, stating that such deactivation is not automatic and must be reconsidered, subject to compliance with filing requirements. The writ petition was allowed to this limited extent, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418769