<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1017 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418766</link>
    <description>The Tribunal granted the petition for winding-up under Sections 272(1)(a) and 271(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. The company, facing financial difficulties and ceased operations since 2014, had eroded net worth and liabilities surpassing assets. With unanimous support from the Board and shareholders, the Tribunal appointed a provisional liquidator as the Company Liquidator to oversee the winding-up process. The decision mandated compliance with the Companies Act, 2013, formation of a winding-up committee, and cessation of legal actions against the company. The application was allowed, and relevant parties were informed of the decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 07:13:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1017 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL , AHMEDABAD BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418766</link>
      <description>The Tribunal granted the petition for winding-up under Sections 272(1)(a) and 271(a) of the Companies Act, 2013. The company, facing financial difficulties and ceased operations since 2014, had eroded net worth and liabilities surpassing assets. With unanimous support from the Board and shareholders, the Tribunal appointed a provisional liquidator as the Company Liquidator to oversee the winding-up process. The decision mandated compliance with the Companies Act, 2013, formation of a winding-up committee, and cessation of legal actions against the company. The application was allowed, and relevant parties were informed of the decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418766</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>