<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1015 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418764</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the Company Appeal, finding no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to valid reasons. The rejection of the appellant&#039;s claim during the liquidation process was upheld, emphasizing that claims rejected during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process cannot be refiled in liquidation. The appellant&#039;s claim to be considered a &#039;Financial Creditor&#039; was denied as it failed to demonstrate disbursement to the corporate debtor as required by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The tribunal concluded that the appellant&#039;s claim was not maintainable and dismissed the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 07:12:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1015 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418764</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the Company Appeal, finding no merit in the appellant&#039;s contentions. The delay in filing the appeal was condoned due to valid reasons. The rejection of the appellant&#039;s claim during the liquidation process was upheld, emphasizing that claims rejected during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process cannot be refiled in liquidation. The appellant&#039;s claim to be considered a &#039;Financial Creditor&#039; was denied as it failed to demonstrate disbursement to the corporate debtor as required by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. The tribunal concluded that the appellant&#039;s claim was not maintainable and dismissed the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418764</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>