<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (2) TMI 1007 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418756</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the respondent correctly availed Cenvat Credit. The Revenue&#039;s case, based on third-party statements and records, lacked substantial evidence. The Tribunal found no justification in denying the credit due to alleged discrepancies in vehicle numbers. The decision aligned with past judgments dismissing similar allegations. The judgment was pronounced on 11.02.2022.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 07:12:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=671081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (2) TMI 1007 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418756</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the impugned order and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, ruling that the respondent correctly availed Cenvat Credit. The Revenue&#039;s case, based on third-party statements and records, lacked substantial evidence. The Tribunal found no justification in denying the credit due to alleged discrepancies in vehicle numbers. The decision aligned with past judgments dismissing similar allegations. The judgment was pronounced on 11.02.2022.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=418756</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>